343.8976 104.7641 344.3976 105.0107 344.8468 105.0107 c 356.7003 104.6118 l 393.6154 177.0504 393.3069 181.1611 394.5402 184.4496 c 369.7863 91.8852 370.3663 92.458 370.3663 93.3066 c 290.7794 101.1181 l 383.1193 104.3579 382.7061 104.6845 382.1554 104.6845 c 0.84055 0 Td [(based on their r)20(elative dif)9(ficulty;)]TJ The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Outcome Measure is a well-recognized self-report questionnaire designed to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any of several musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. The ULFI is a single-page 25-item PRO on a 3-point Likert scale. 336.0236 104.6118 l 299.2682 95.2407 298.8922 94.7124 298.4442 94.3525 c 277.7787 93.1123 l 245.7079 91.4257 244.7077 94.8754 244.5919 95.2749 c 257.483 97.4126 l /F1 1 Tf /GS0 gs Q BT BT 343.1866 101.9726 l 10 0 0 10 36 697.5294 Tm 248.7897 90.4638 250.9357 96.1494 250.9777 96.2597 c q ET All Rights Reserved.Syntax is a registered trademark of Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.Syntax + y B G T U F S X Z P N V Q Y J E C M * O 6 / 4 5 &. 281.099 97.1445 l 341.3234 104.9379 l S [(of the DASH Outcome Measur)20(e. Instead)]TJ 295.0756 101.8383 294.5717 101.038 293.2995 101.038 c /GS3 gs 294.028 92.1284 m 321.5743 96.54 l 403.3785 288.9667 401.8369 283.5196 401.2201 279.2036 c 15.504 0 0 15.504 98.2279 649.714 Tm 0 -1.3 TD Stepan, J. G., D. A. London, et al. ET /GS3 gs 234.2794 97.4126 l ET 414.4776 245.3923 421.9794 258.444 426.5018 273.4482 c 381.8995 141.1836 383.1327 147.5551 385.9076 153.3101 c 0.05 scn 0 0 0 1 k 429.7904 525.3373 427.3239 526.2623 424.7544 527.0843 c 279.1869 94.9126 l 379.433 182.5996 380.4605 187.1218 381.3858 191.849 c 41.538 0 0 40.187 142.8798 624.9278 Tm 345.6447 104.4594 345.4122 104.6845 344.8468 104.6845 c 321.4366 102.5673 l 282.6349 101.8383 282.7631 101.8061 282.995 101.8222 c 313.7955 84.538 l Tj f For example, if a patient an-swered 2, or Mild Difficulty, to all 30 ques-tions, the raw score would be 60. 371.4259 96.54 l 362.9897 129.0567 l -2.2004 -1.3 TD 0 0 0 1 k 341.3888 101.8715 340.8234 101.5742 340.1925 101.5742 c (Quick)Tj /GS3 gs 0 -1.3 TD Initially reviewed by Kim Kurtz, SPT Lindsay Braun, SPT Julie Canfield, SPT Drew Grant, SPT Sean Husted, SPT Becca Todd, SPT Christine Ulses, SPT Mitch Therriault, SPT and Jen Tier, SPT in 5/2014. 356.4124 147.7609 357.9542 147.1441 358.1599 145.8082 c BT BT 408.6198 92.2649 407.9004 92.2649 407.6946 92.0596 c 10 0 0 10 243.3623 554.046 Tm 344.2745 104.6845 343.7306 104.271 343.5495 103.8793 c 360.9854 94.9233 l [(which ar)20(e beyond the scope of the 11-)]TJ 279.8427 82.3784 l f 374.1918 170.8842 367.512 165.2318 362.476 157.1129 c BT ET 318.4137 102.3715 319.0226 101.9003 319.7765 101.9003 c 366.6984 90.6386 l [(original domains wer)20(e r)19(educed to 11)]TJ /F1 1 Tf 0.67351 0 Td /GS2 gs 237.3932 89.0483 238.8883 89.0483 y -2.35181 -1.3 TD 1.33081 0 TD 419.4105 104.2891 417.6634 104.8029 416.944 104.3919 c 336.3936 104.5463 l 0 0 0 1 k 314.4987 96.8662 l 4.70874 0 TD 451.7831 619.2687 461.9574 626.1542 473.4674 629.6487 c Q 0 0 0 1 k 10.853 0 0 10.853 184.5284 600.1463 Tm -0.0001 Tc 333.5518 94.749 334.0518 94.9956 334.5011 94.9956 c 406.5645 203.7702 405.8451 194.9323 403.5838 187.2245 c 316.5938 81.9643 l BMC musculoskeletal disorders 10(1): 161. 324.6632 104.9379 l 397.3151 117.6493 395.5681 112.3054 396.0818 105.317 c f 287.0272 91.3681 l Q 356.2296 104.6118 l 265.4337 84.2426 l h 400.2952 515.7796 404.9197 520.0961 409.5447 523.179 c 0 Tc 248.7897 90.4638 250.9357 96.1494 250.9777 96.2597 c 408.9278 200.4817 407.0781 193.8018 406.256 187.5326 c The median DASH score at baseline and at 2-week follow-up was significantly higher in the radial group vs the transfemoral control group (p < 0.05) (Table 3). DASH Outcome Measure - Institute for Work and Health 365.0743 94.0678 l (T)Tj 344.7091 94.749 345.2096 94.9956 345.6593 94.9956 c 9.98438 0 TD 357.1212 101.9726 l 279.1707 94.9126 l 321.4727 83.4433 m 9.21939 0.00001 TD 341.9474 94.9233 l 235.6432 98.6567 234.8873 99.4126 234.8873 100.3461 c 61.568 415.561 m 0.026 Tw London, D. A., J. G. Stepan, et al. 318.6671 82.3418 319.2765 81.8701 320.0304 81.8701 c 14 0 0 14 170.83 571.0818 Tm 286.2752 104.8144 l 325.1271 91.5737 l 0 0 0 1 k /GS2 gs 388.2714 85.2766 386.1129 89.182 386.8324 93.2929 c 263.7775 81.6181 m 386.6271 564.1843 387.4492 567.7812 388.2714 571.2751 c 387.5518 203.2565 390.4294 215.7943 391.6627 228.3325 c 379.712 101.9726 l 324.6779 103.9375 l 314.6075 104.5683 l Regarding manual labor, Jester et al. 273.1781 101.7661 273.3702 101.7104 273.6022 101.7104 c 0.026 Tw 333.6818 81.9428 l 289.4596 95.1445 289.8117 94.9126 289.8117 94.4804 c 0.33281 0.00001 TD 280.6669 93.1123 l s (advantages to using the full DASH)Tj 0 -1.3 TD (evaluated and compar)Tj 385.188 144.3691 387.8604 155.0576 390.2237 165.9509 c f 430.3042 423.3896 l 0.3271 w /GS3 gs q 372.4044 96.8662 l 321.6906 82.5371 l [(DASH, r)20(esulting in gr)19(eater confidence)]TJ Q Shirley Ryan AbilityLab does not provide emergency medical services. h 368.257 101.6464 l /F0 1 Tf 371.4259 91.958 m 247.7018 81.7065 l "Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up." 301.2843 91.3681 l 380.8717 108.6057 379.433 110.25 377.8914 109.3247 c [(DASH versions\) wer)20(e)]TJ 0.55816 0 TD f /GS3 gs 0 -1.30001 TD /GS3 gs 280.2269 96.3608 l 346.6959 94.9956 346.819 94.4448 346.819 93.6835 c 10 0 0 10 451.9692 303.6637 Tm Q f 291.9078 92.1284 l 389.5047 498.206 388.8877 505.9138 387.0382 513.4157 c 68.5379 439.8417 m 324.837 91.5737 l Enter your zip code . 0 -1.3 TD Mintken (2009): Since its development, it has been cross-culturally adapted and validated in over 20 languages, Mintken (2009):Highresponsiveness (ES=0.82), Pathologies of Outpatient Hand Clinic Patients, London (2014):Adequatetest-retest reliability (ICC=0.68). 300.0043 91.3681 l 0.80342 0 Td 452.0911 617.0079 454.969 617.9327 457.9493 619.2687 c 404.7143 168.4178 404.7143 171.1922 404.098 174.1729 c 234.2382 89.0483 l 346.4567 93.7124 l 1.00536 0 Td f [(disability/symptom scor)20(e is followed to)]TJ 109.5662 428.3 m /F11 1 Tf Quick dash outcome measure pdf - United States manuals Cognitive Guidelines 337.3146 92.393 337.9816 91.8852 338.6994 91.8852 c (-)Tj [(separately)135(. 245.1391 97.4126 l 348.8346 90.769 349.3639 90.6386 349.9005 90.6386 c f -0.0002 Tc 357.7487 157.6267 362.7843 163.1763 368.2309 169.1367 c 234.8873 101.2778 235.6432 102.0336 236.5758 102.0336 c 408.6198 123.1986 409.853 117.6493 409.853 112.408 c h 277.2184 84.7627 l 0 Tc 380.1525 75.9245 379.8442 73.5612 377.5831 74.486 c Manual therapy 15(4): 404-407. 292.1956 94.3046 l 398.8567 211.8889 396.3901 199.8652 393.8207 188.252 c 274.1542 84.6264 275.0104 85.3945 275.9865 85.3945 c [(population, clinical setting or tr)20(eatment)]TJ 288.3954 92.1284 l /CS2 cs 1 scn 274.8583 103.6225 l BT 432.1538 522.4594 434.0038 520.9182 436.0593 519.0681 c Original Editor - Nicole Wente as part of the Temple University EBP Project, Top Contributors - Nicole Wente, Admin, Rachael Lowe, Kim Jackson, Abbey Wright, Scott A Burns, Laura Ritchie, Rucha Gadgil, Lauren Lopez, Tony Lowe, Evan Thomas, Scott Buxton, WikiSysop, Claire Knott and Robin Tacchetti, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. 263.7775 86.6108 l -0.0002 Tc /GS3 gs 281.6349 96.3608 l (patient evaluation \(i.e. In 2021, your cash gifts may also favorably impact your taxes, thanks to the extension of many of the charitable provisions in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act. /F2 1 Tf 321.0167 96.54 l 379.1397 101.9726 l [(disability/symptom scor)20(e. By this same)]TJ BT 446.6445 429.864 442.8422 439.3187 438.0118 448.1571 c 331.3766 91.958 l 0.1 scn 272.4342 94.3525 l 356.2296 101.9726 l 1.08 -2.01999 TD BT 9.44326 13.72 TD Q Significantly greater reductions in disability among patients rating themselves as improved versus stable. -0.0002 Tc 401.1174 240.3564 398.7536 229.2572 395.7734 219.0831 c -8.37135 -1.3 TD T* 244.0648 97.4126 l [(disor)20(ders. f 362.8488 91.958 l (DASH)Tj 265.4337 106.1108 l 326.548 103.1474 l [(section \(11 items, scor)20(ed 1-5\) and the)]TJ BT 434.5175 340.4541 432.7705 336.3434 431.5374 331.9241 c T* T* 257.483 96.2597 l 331.4781 104.6845 330.9054 104.039 330.9054 103.3574 c 289.8117 94.0805 289.4915 93.8247 289.1234 93.8247 c ET Spine 35(24): 2150-2156. ES: QuickDASH/DASH= 1.42/1.65. 237.5087 102.0336 238.2643 101.2778 238.2643 100.3461 c /GS3 gs 8,9 With respect to the decision on manual labor, Jester et al. f (2013). 347.3917 91.958 l (onsisting of four items. 336.234 91.958 l (optional modules because each module)Tj BT 0 Tc /F12 1 Tf 387.0382 188.5604 m 392.896 188.6631 390.2237 188.9714 391.6627 190.8216 c ET 371.6427 103.1474 l 265.3378 95.0644 l Free Online QuickDASH Score Calculator - OrthoToolKit Free Online QuickDASH Score Calculator-- OrthoToolKit About the score Supporting literature About the score developer QuickDASH Score: 0.0 / 100 = 0.0 % Graphical QuickDASH Score: (%) Click here to download a completed PDF report Click here to download a blank PDF report 0.15 scn h 249.6812 95.9702 247.4725 90.1792 247.2877 89.6938 c 479.6336 627.2848 479.5309 624.2016 479.4283 621.2215 c "Internal consistency and validity of the QuickDASH instrument for upper extremity injuries in older children." 391.56 128.9537 390.7379 130.0842 389.9158 129.879 c 382.5538 105.0107 382.9093 104.8584 383.2354 104.561 c 17.4934 0 TD 342.5997 106.8808 l [(The thir)20(d scale was cr)19(eated using Rasch)]TJ )]TJ 330.5431 104.1333 331.2462 105.0107 332.2609 105.0107 c 423.7269 611.8695 427.0156 616.3913 432.0511 617.0079 c Patients with a Quick-DASH score below 15 could be considered totally recovered, and patients with a Quick-DASH score above 40 could be . BT 0 0 0 1 k 454.2496 362.8579 455.4828 359.4667 456.2023 356.5891 c 281.715 106.0947 l 404.3033 145.7054 405.4338 143.7529 406.0503 141.4917 c [(the assigned values for each r)20(esponse)]TJ 274.2743 102.8706 271.85 102.1342 271.85 103.6865 c 368.4367 105.625 377.1718 122.6849 370.6975 137.9978 c 0.25 scn Beaton, D., C. Bombardier, et al. 14 0 0 14 120.374 745.5 Tm 323.0099 94.9233 l [(V)90(AS of overall pr)19(oblem)-8308(r = 0.70)-15679(r = 0.70)]TJ BT 0.026 Tw DASH and QuickDASH Scoring Formula = ([(sum of n responses)/n] -1)(25) where n represents the number of completed items. 379.589 92.2841 l Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (M)Tj [(patient monitoring. 387.4913 94.6694 386.8536 94.1401 386.7736 93.4585 c 352.4303 104.2568 l 409.5447 148.583 410.1611 147.9662 410.8805 148.0689 c 242.8373 89.3637 l 275.3224 96.3608 l 0 Tc Q /GS3 gs 289.4354 101.038 289.2675 101.2944 289.2675 101.9345 c BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 7(1): 44. 8.74366 0.00001 TD 253.2826 97.4126 l 321.3936 81.8847 320.6828 81.5439 319.987 81.5439 c -0.38886 -1.30001 TD 369.6563 106.5546 l 411.9084 138.82 412.3195 141.6974 410.8805 143.136 c 398.6509 167.8009 398.9594 168.0062 399.3705 168.1092 c 438.7314 371.6963 436.7786 373.649 438.2173 375.7044 c 18.6 9.1 TD 393.2043 135.9424 393.9238 140.3616 393.3069 145.1917 c 238.8883 89.0483 l 0.026 Tw (version of the )Tj 335.299 93.7124 l 327.9689 86.5249 l BT 378.7979 90.6386 l 322.5099 104.5249 322.8439 105.0107 323.6774 105.0107 c 266.0258 101.9023 l 277.1385 84.0825 276.8424 84.6264 276.1305 84.6264 c /GS3 gs 364.6251 101.9003 365.1104 102.1543 365.3859 102.5673 c 0 -1.3 TD 357.6652 101.6464 l -13.13013 -1.30001 TD [(in 1996. 325.2579 102.06 324.7433 101.5742 323.9816 101.5742 c f (\()Tj 0.78461 0 Td 363.4288 104.6845 362.7902 104.1552 362.7111 103.4736 c f 361.5001 102.3354 l 315.9708 86.5029 l q 243.3966 91.247 244.3026 94.3002 244.5919 95.2749 c 349.7916 91.8852 m 290.1395 91.3681 l 474.7007 484.1264 472.748 482.071 470.7953 479.913 c Q 0 0 0 1 K 0.05 w 325.6056 84.0307 325.0836 84.6543 324.2501 84.6543 c [(www)125(.dash.iwh.on.ca. 327.3527 86.851 l %PDF-1.4 % 336.0236 101.9726 l (The )Tj The range of the scores, thereforefrom 30 to 150equals 120. -0.0002 Tc 273.5543 104.8945 273.8663 104.8066 274.1222 104.6147 c 341.9474 96.4384 l q /F10 1 Tf "Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain." [1][2][3] This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire that patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5 point Likert scale.[1][2]. /GS3 gs 416.6356 221.858 412.4222 213.5333 411.3942 204.2843 c (2005). 459.6961 398.0054 458.5656 381.6647 458.6689 368.202 c 152.525 415.294 l (n)Tj BT 286.9071 85.3383 287.1393 85.3945 287.4113 85.3945 c 247.7018 99.1704 l 253.2826 96.0405 253.2826 96.2597 v 241.1015 96.2597 l [(multiple musculoskeletal disor)20(ders of)]TJ 0.05 w 411.3942 587.4101 409.75 585.8686 409.6473 583.0936 c Institute for Work & Health 1(1): 1-45. /GS3 gs 265.9457 95.0644 l -5.877 -2.02 TD q 366.6622 101.9726 m 316.4054 104.1621 316.6231 103.6909 316.6231 103.0532 c -0.0001 Tc BT 10 0 0 10 262.4564 303.6637 Tm f 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v /GS3 gs [(Internal Consistency)-10086(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.94)-8949(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.97)]TJ 10 0 0 10 222 291.96 Tm /GS2 gs Shoulder Program of Care - QuickDASH Outcome Instructions Type of file PDF Attachment File shoulderpoc_quickdashinstructions.pdf Businesses Injured or ill people Health care providers About us Policy Contact us Businesses Registration and coverage Premiums and payment Account maintenance Claims Return to work Appeals Small business 312.7804 81.9643 l (data is available on the )Tj BT 387.1409 244.056 387.963 248.2698 388.2714 252.278 c 375.7316 101.6464 l /GS3 gs 384.366 174.7892 384.8797 173.0422 385.4966 171.8091 c -0.78458 -1.3 TD [(0-100 scale. 293.9554 101.8061 294.1876 102.1582 294.2277 102.2065 c 333.9943 104.6118 l 361.5724 91.958 l 237.1911 89.0483 l /GS3 gs S 0.78462 0 Td q 390.0184 577.0306 393.1016 581.0381 394.1291 586.6906 c 393.5122 130.8038 l (\(See Psychometric)Tj 235.7018 98.8042 235.0094 99.4965 235.0094 100.3501 c f 373.9863 151.1521 l f -39.61123 -2.42 TD 440.1699 416.5038 440.3756 410.4405 442.6364 404.8911 c 1 g 351.1837 90.6386 350.5382 90.312 349.9005 90.312 c 2.20044 0 TD 277.9706 82.3784 l 336.379 104.5463 m (total DASH scor)Tj Thr)Tj 269.4579 93.7924 269.1381 94.3764 268.3859 94.3764 c 351.1837 94.0385 350.5675 94.6694 349.7916 94.6694 c 452.8106 372.3131 m (of 30 items, the )Tj 376.8917 94.0966 376.2833 94.6694 375.4562 94.6694 c 410.9837 185.066 408.7225 176.7418 413.8611 171.0895 c 240.4262 90.3295 238.2201 96.1469 238.1764 96.2597 c ET q 316.4561 106.8808 316.8693 106.2793 316.8693 105.6269 c 278.5546 85.3144 l 396.9039 174.8918 394.6429 174.1729 392.3822 173.7616 c /CS2 cs 1 scn 325.9826 81.9428 m 0 792 0 0 re /GS3 gs QuickDASH Scoring e-tool. 268.538 82.4023 l 321.1398 104.1987 320.4801 104.6845 319.7623 104.6845 c Fan, Z. J., C. K. Smith, et al. T* 264.3937 101.9023 l /GS2 gs 408.5172 109.5305 l 408.9278 516.8076 408.3114 512.0798 409.0309 505.2969 c 401.8369 205.6202 401.2201 199.9679 399.6789 193.8018 c q (and low levels of disability\). (wer)Tj 267.1937 101.8784 l 410.778 95.1424 413.2443 84.8657 409.0309 77.3636 c 294.028 94.3046 l 401.5284 135.7366 402.248 134.6061 401.9395 133.4759 c ET 427.8376 249.5031 424.3433 239.74 419.8214 230.2847 c 449.2136 352.2727 449.522 351.0395 449.1109 350.32 c 263.7855 106.8945 l (DASH)Tj 409.1336 220.7274 407.3861 216.6167 407.7976 211.8889 c q BT 432.8732 372.8269 433.4901 370.8741 435.0318 371.0795 c 271.0663 94.3046 l (r)Tj The raw score is then transformed to a zero-to-100 scale with zero reflecting no The DASH and QuickDASH have two optional 4-item additional modules that can be used. 326.5412 81.6167 l 315.7745 96.518 l 453.4274 424.1091 455.277 422.2589 456.4076 420.7172 c 291.3073 104.1264 292.1635 104.8945 293.2995 104.8945 c (number of items with > 40% in)Tj 411.4973 105.8307 m 131.252 484.866 238.328 27.634 re 383.0977 94.6694 382.4601 94.1401 382.38 93.4585 c 280.7628 82.3784 l -0.51884 -1.30001 TD 283.9791 84.5546 l 375.5276 148.3772 372.7533 146.6304 370.1837 143.5471 c f ET It uses the DASH scale and scoring method and allows for one missing response . 314.3756 93.6254 l q The DASH has been translated in many different languages and has demonstrated to be a valid and reliable questionnaire for a variety of upper extremity disorders. 312.7804 101.6464 l 371.4259 96.8662 l /F11 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 468.8496 453.2083 Tm 290.7794 101.8383 l 375.7316 101.9726 l 331.3693 101.5742 330.5431 102.2192 330.5431 103.3432 c 374.6447 94.6694 374.0285 94.0966 374.0285 93.2631 c [(that par)10(ticular context is r)19(ecommended. 314.4191 81.9643 l "Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period." 385.2908 216.6167 l 399.0621 148.6857 m 0.032 Tw 404.3033 277.2509 403.9949 290.1999 407.6946 303.2516 c [(individuals may be having dif)10(ficulties)]TJ 375.4562 94.6694 m "The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH." -0.0001 Tc [(measur)20(e to use. h 355.7433 96.518 l 356.1349 94.2417 l 0 0 0 1 k 10 0 0 10 36 612.7 Tm 152.7504 439.8854 l 10 0 0 10 451.9692 334.8635 Tm 0 Tw 410.1611 579.4969 411.0863 582.4772 411.6 586.0744 c [(SRM = 0.79)-14108(SRM = 0.78)]TJ ALL RIGHTS RESER)Tj (Quick)Tj 354.214 104.9379 l /GS2 gs T* q 378.7765 101.9726 l f 430.8179 331.7189 431.4347 330.8969 431.1263 330.5883 c (Quick)Tj q T* Scoring the Quick DASH The Quick DASH is scored in two components: the disability/symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5) and the optional high performance sport/music or work modules (four items, scored 1-5). Arthritis care & research 63(S11): S174-S188. [(pr)20(oduced. 1 0 obj << /OPM 1 /Type /ExtGState >> endobj 3 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream 10 0 0 10 55.1284 299.1599 Tm let the examiners self-assess their own work as manual or non-manual, and Klum et al . -0.0001 Tc A Young Scientist's Journey after a Stroke, Care by the Numbers: Skilled Nursing versus Inpatient Rehabilitation, WSJ: Recognizing Aphasia and Seeking Treatment, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Ranked No. 235.0094 101.2026 235.7018 101.8969 236.5558 101.8969 c T* T* 1 w 286.0673 101.8061 286.8432 101.8862 286.8432 102.8383 c PDF QuickDASH*Score* - OrthoToolKit 288.7233 104.8144 l (compose the EITC-based version of the)Tj )Tj 360.8317 154.5434 358.1599 151.9743 357.132 149.0967 c 295.1476 102.2065 l 360.6232 94.5971 l (ovided that psychometric)Tj If this is an emergency, please dial 911. 0 -1.3 TD (oduced using the item-r)Tj 287.7633 104.8144 l 247.1432 90.2133 247.2877 89.6938 v (DASH,)Tj 282.6349 104.0546 l 0.1 scn 401.8369 518.4518 l 251.0917 333.8635 m f 234.2794 96.2597 l Link to Instrument Instrument Details Acronym QuickDASH Area of Assessment Activities of Daily Living Communication Coordination Dexterity Eating (the full DASH. -0.0002 Tc 10 0 0 10 245.5181 449.36 Tm BT 454.969 414.5511 452.708 417.7371 451.4747 421.0258 c Franchignoni (2011): A Rasch analysis was performed, which showed that 10 of the 11 QuickDASH items fitted the Rasch model (MnSq between 0.7 and 1.3). 281.0109 91.3681 l 0 0 0 0 k . Scoring the DASH 30-item disability/symptom section: 366.9976 142.8279 368.1284 142.2111 367.9229 141.3891 c 342.5997 106.5546 l 10 0 0 10 222 245.76 Tm (than the others, and was chosen and)Tj q 317.609 81.9643 l 109.764 428.3 l 10 0 0 10 408 453.2083 Tm (=)Tj /GS2 gs 263.7855 106.1108 l (The assigned values for all completed)Tj 322.5314 84.1035 323.235 84.9804 324.2501 84.9804 c 10 0 0 10 36 132.4517 Tm 235.7345 96.2597 235.9357 96.2597 v 0.51884 0.00001 TD )Tj 272.9542 91.3681 l 449.7277 374.1627 447.4666 371.4905 444.6918 370.052 c q /F2 1 Tf BT /GS3 gs 0 0 0 1 k 412.011 136.7645 411.7027 136.3534 411.0863 136.3534 c (using the full DASH in individual)Tj 242.8373 89.3618 m 376.8639 176.7418 l 386.7736 93.1323 l [(r)20(elations and known-gr)20(oup dif)9(fer)20(ences statistically significant at p> endobj 18 0 obj << /Length 45111 >> stream T* 330.8185 91.958 l (f)Tj q (ed using data)Tj Q 382.4386 92.3569 383.047 91.8852 383.8009 91.8852 c 413.2443 94.0123 413.8611 99.0478 413.039 102.8502 c 328.3317 81.9428 l (2006). (25.4 vs. 48.6)Tj This transformation)Tj 346.4567 91.958 l /GS2 gs (impor)Tj 385.5343 104.6845 384.8956 104.1552 384.8165 103.4736 c Q 316.9855 81.9643 l 273.3541 82.3383 272.8502 81.538 271.578 81.538 c (item DASH and with other markers)Tj 394.4376 203.976 396.2871 217.7472 400.5009 230.0794 c 235.7345 96.2597 235.9357 96.2597 v T* 0 0 0 1 k 0 -1.3 TD For the patients who rated their arm status after surgery as better (much better and somewhat better) and as unchanged, the difference in area under ROC curves for DASH & QuickDASH=0.01, indicating excellent convergent validity with the DASH, as there is no ability to discriminate a difference between the 2 groups. /GS2 gs 237.1911 96.2597 l 263.7855 101.1181 m 268.6979 104.1264 268.3539 103.8867 268.1139 103.6064 c 0.032 Tw 286.2752 85.0024 286.4752 85.1464 286.6913 85.2426 c Q (2009). q 264.4176 96.0244 l 0.83105 0 TD 276.3065 104.0546 l Q 10 0 0 10 492.3677 453.2083 Tm Please answer every question, basedon your condition in the last week,by circling the appropriate number. [(domains wer)20(e chosen to comprise the)]TJ (2014). Examined by comparing the baseline and follow-up scores of both the stable and improved groups. 252.129 96.0405 252.129 96.2597 v /CS0 cs 0.7 scn ET (be)' f 349.0518 94.6694 348.4718 93.9516 348.4718 93.2631 c 436.4702 371.902 l 332.7614 81.9428 l 321.611 94.017 321.0451 94.6694 320.2404 94.6694 c /GS3 gs 242.8383 89.3657 l q 389.3185 94.9956 390 94.2128 390 93.1323 c 333.2179 94.2924 l (The highest-ranking)Tj q 282.411 84.5546 l Q 271.0663 95.0644 l 285.3551 104.8144 l 316.3477 91.9794 l -18.72 -3.24999 TD /GS3 gs 277.2265 106.0947 l f 0.5 w 415.5054 598.3038 418.0746 602.723 421.4659 606.6279 c 412.628 146.6304 412.8332 142.4169 415.4023 139.1283 c 367.6554 90.6386 l (s)Tj 0 0 0 1 k f 37.5 37.4999 537 717 re f 400.7064 168.0062 l 247.7018 106.853 m 455.9965 364.7079 452.2969 368.5103 454.3522 373.1352 c q BT -0.0002 Tc 284.6351 87.3945 l 238.2201 96.1469 240.4262 90.3295 241.4633 87.5952 c Angst, F., H. K. Schwyzer, et al. 269.6581 101.8784 l Q 247.6986 89.3618 l (Psychometric Properties)Tj (Quick)Tj /F12 1 Tf f 238.1012 99.4965 237.4091 98.8042 236.5558 98.8042 c BT 376.6818 104.9379 l 334.7262 91.958 l /CS1 CS 1 SCN (Convergent Construct)Tj (by selecting items that had the highest)Tj ET 275.3224 97.1445 m 321.5743 92.2407 l BT 316.275 96.518 l /GS2 gs /GS3 gs 297.7562 93.7763 m (e.)Tj q 269.5221 95.1445 270.3781 94.3764 270.3781 93.2163 c 362.3477 104.271 363.1535 105.0107 364.1681 105.0107 c I assume that Quick DASH scores of >80 are not included because a Quick DASH score that would equate to a "very severe" or level four functional scale would be akin to the grade modifier for functional history (GMFH) that is two . 14 0 0 14 153.812 745.5 Tm PDF DASH que02qxd (Page 2) - WSIB (2010). 335.5382 94.9956 335.6613 94.4448 335.6613 93.6835 c [(with various upper)50(-limb disor)19(ders\). 450.0358 381.9731 m h 368.334 146.1167 369.4645 147.9662 371.4169 149.0967 c /GS2 gs 386.6271 187.8409 386.8324 187.2245 387.3462 186.5051 c 410.6752 496.9727 410.6752 497.6923 410.5725 498.3086 c (2009). 421.4659 575.0778 418.3829 560.4845 418.7939 544.658 c (DASH)Tj 403.2755 186.0939 405.2281 185.9913 408.0031 186.4024 c [(lank by the r)20(espondent, you will not)]TJ 397.8289 113.0244 l 391.4569 235.1151 394.0265 240.8705 395.5681 247.3451 c (and divide by four (number of items);)Tj 283.7552 94.3764 283.4352 93.7924 283.4352 93.2163 c 360.4494 105.0107 360.8038 104.8584 361.13 104.561 c 317.609 81.6167 l There was a significant interaction between groups for the pretest and post-test scores, indicating that the change in QuickDASH with time differed between stable and improved patients. 240.4262 90.3295 238.2201 96.1469 238.1764 96.2597 c 290.1873 104.0546 l -6.14698 -1.25 TD 366.3813 144.7803 366.5867 143.9581 366.3813 143.3416 c (elation (EITC))Tj T* 272.6823 101.1181 l 14 0 0 14 216.0932 508.9183 Tm 0.15 scn 0.026 Tw 1.37271 0 Td 1,23. and Rasch analysis, 12,13. but many different approach-es have been used to calculate the respon-siveness of these measures, in particular the minimal clinically important differ-ence (MCID), also known as the mini- 344.9196 91.6318 l 419.102 138.6142 421.5685 135.5312 421.5685 131.5233 c Q&A: The Role of the - AMA Guides 0 -1.30001 TD BT 404.2006 148.172 403.5838 156.4962 401.3232 163.8955 c /GS2 gs /F12 1 Tf (y)Tj 238.8883 87.896 l /GS2 gs The DASH Outcome Measure and Quick DASH, as well as a user's manual, scoring instructions, frequently asked questions and research updates, are available from the . Q BT /GS2 gs -9.98438 -1.3 TD 362.2618 91.6318 l /GS2 gs 0 Tw [(DASH Outcome Measur)20(e. )]TJ 447.8777 633.0399 460.5184 646.4 474.3922 658.0132 c 326.9757 101.5742 326.1856 102.27 326.1856 103.2417 c 265.3378 94.3046 l 280.1469 101.8784 l (2009). 399.9868 81.6796 402.5563 90.7236 401.3232 97.712 c (Change in gr)Tj 0 -1.30001 TD 10 0 0 10 54.9526 705.1 Tm (stablishing the psychometric)Tj 360.4205 130.8038 360.5231 130.3925 360.5231 129.9816 c 257.483 97.4126 l Q /F2 1 Tf 314.4552 101.6464 l 248.0936 96.2597 l 301.2843 94.4165 l 344.1076 101.9726 l /F2 1 Tf 348.4865 91.559 348.1095 92.6904 348.1095 93.2631 c -1.17339 -1.30001 TD 386.4214 174.1729 385.188 175.3029 383.8522 175.9197 c f -7.90332 -1.3 TD (2011). [(her)20(e ar)19(e two optional modules, each)]TJ 377.2404 101.9726 l 435.9565 610.842 439.1425 612.0753 442.2253 612.7941 c 358.0343 94.2417 l 363.9142 94.6694 363.5157 94.3647 363.2111 94.0312 c /F11 1 Tf 457.3324 368.5103 l h )]TJ Q 326.5412 84.582 l 354.127 101.9726 l ET 0 -1.3 TD 336.3859 101.9726 l 271.8822 102.3745 l Download a document which contains information about Scoring the Quick DASH. 316.507 93.2773 l 0.05 scn 384.9249 94.9956 385.6065 94.2128 385.6065 93.1323 c
Florida Man September 8, 2004,
Manage My Booking Tui,
Lenoir County Mugshots 2022,
Dj Fitzpatrick Wellington,
Sylvia Newsome Obituary,
Articles Q